Start free

轉錄WAV檔案並附說話者標籤。無損品質。

現場錄音機、錄音室會話和廣播檔案的WAV檔案可獲得最高轉錄準確度——無需處理編碼壓縮問題。上傳任何WAV檔案，即可獲得完整的說話者標籤逐字稿。

Drop a file, or pick one

MP3 · WAV · M4A · MP4 · MOV · MKV · OGG · OPUS · FLAC · WEBM — up to 100 MB anonymously

Paste a link, we’ll fetch the audio

YouTube · TikTok · Vimeo · Twitter · SoundCloud · Spotify · 50+ more

Record straight from your browser

Sign up takes 30 seconds — recording opens right after, in the dashboard.

No card required~90s per 60-min fileSRT · VTT · DOCX · TXTFiles auto-deleted in 24h

↓ Watch what happens

Audio in. Transcript out.

Drop a file, paste a URL, or record live — text appears back with speaker labels and timestamps. Same pipeline whether the source is a file, a URL, or your microphone.

Microphone · liveREC 00:07.41
en-US auto-detected16 kHz mono
~90s
Transcript · streaming2 speakers · 47:08
S1

Thanks for making the time. I want to start with framing — what was the original hypothesis behind the project?

S2

Honestly, maybe forty percent. The shape held — the mechanics underneath had to be rebuilt almost entirely.

S1

What flipped it for you? Was there one customer call, one piece of data

~95% accuracy on clean audioSRT · DOCX · TXT · JSON

↓ This is the dashboard

This is what loads when the job finishes.

Same layout as the real dashboard — Summary, full Transcript, Speakers tab, Exports. Key points and action items extracted automatically. Auto-tags on every job.

Try it on your own file — it's free

Three real options · honest comparison

Built-in dictation, AI speech-to-text, or a human transcriber.

Three legitimate ways to get text from spoken audio in 2026. Each is best for different work. Honest numbers below — no claim that AI matches a professional human transcriber on hard audio.

Option 01

Built-in dictation

Live, free, on-device. Handy for short bursts while you talk.

Accuracy · clear English~85%
Speaker separationNo
TimestampsNo
Languages~30
60-min fileLive only
CostFree
Best forShort voice notes while you walk. Hands-free messaging. Dictating an email at a stoplight.
Option 02

AI speech-to-text

~30× faster than realtime. 100+ languages. Speaker labels. The sweet spot for most work.

Accuracy · clear English95%+
Speaker separationYes (Pro+)
TimestampsPer sentence
Languages100+ auto
60-min file~90 s
Cost · per min$0.03
Best forInterview recordings · meeting notes · podcast transcripts · YouTube subtitles · batch jobs · API automation · field journalism.
Option 03

Human transcriber

Gold-standard accuracy when the audio is hard or the stakes are legal.

Accuracy · clear English98–99%
Speaker separationManual
TimestampsPer turn
LanguagesPer transcriber
60-min file4–8 hours
Cost · per min$1–3
Best forLegal depositions · medical dictation · archival oral history · anything where 95%+ accuracy is non-negotiable.

Built-in dictation figures from public iOS / Android speech API benchmarks. Human transcriber rates from US/UK industry surveys 2024–2025.

Accuracy · real-world numbers

95%+ on clear English. It holds up on real-world recordings too.

Modern transcription reaches 95%+ word accuracy on clear English at 128 kbps and above, comparable to a human transcriber on the same recording. The audio coming in sets the ceiling — cleaner source, cleaner transcript. The breakdown below covers the recordings we actually see in production.

97%+
Clean studio audio

USB or studio microphone in a treated room. Single speaker at conversational distance. The headline number.

95%+
Clear English at 128 kbps+

Podcast masters, interview recordings, well-mic'd meetings. The sweet spot for most professional work.

93%
Real-world podcast

Field-recorded interviews, podcast episodes at 64–128 kbps, multi-speaker recordings. Usable for editorial without a review pass.

91%
Meeting room recording

Ceiling mic, omnidirectional capture, mild reverb, multiple speakers at distance. Plan a rename pass on the speaker chips.

Common questions

6 things people ask about this.

01支援哪些WAV規格？+
任何PCM WAV檔案：取樣率8 kHz至192 kHz，位元深度16-bit、24-bit或32-bit浮點，單聲道或立體聲。標準WAV（.wav）和廣播波格式（.bwf）副檔名均可直接使用，無需轉換。
02無損WAV真的能提高轉錄準確度嗎？+
是的，小幅提升。WAV讓轉錄管線獲得完整的音訊訊號，無知覺壓縮偽影。在大多數錄音上，與高品質MP3相比，提升約1–3%。在困難錄音（濃重口音、輕微背景噪音、邊界音質）上，這個差距就有影響。
03我的現場錄音機儲存24-bit 96 kHz的WAV檔案。能用嗎？+
可以。24-bit 96 kHz WAV可直接接受並運作，無需任何轉換。處理管線會在內部正規化取樣率——96 kHz不會減慢處理速度或導致相容性問題。
04WAV檔案的最大大小是多少？+
免費方案：100 MB（約10分鐘16-bit 44.1 kHz立體聲，約20分鐘單聲道），每個檔案上限30分鐘。專業版：2 GB（約45分鐘立體聲，約90分鐘單聲道），每個檔案時長上限10小時。商業版：5 GB（約3小時立體聲，約6小時單聲道），每個檔案時長上限10小時。WAV更受大小限制而非時長。對於多檔案資料庫，請將每個檔案作為獨立的API任務提交。
05可以從WAV檔案取得SRT嗎？+
可以。從逐字稿頁面匯出SRT或VTT檔。時間戳對應WAV位置——如果您正在將此WAV作為音軌編輯影片，這很實用。
06WAV比MP3更適合轉錄嗎？+
在同等錄音條件下，WAV比128 kbps MP3高出1–3%的準確度——比64 kbps或更低則更為顯著。如果您有原始WAV錄音，請使用它。如果您只有MP3，清晰的語音仍可達到95%以上的準確度。

Drop something in. See what comes out.

每月30分鐘免費，無需信用卡。上傳您的WAV檔案——約90秒內即可獲得逐字稿、說話者標籤和SRT。

開始免費轉錄