Transkribera WAV-fílur við talaramerkingum.Kvalitet uttan tap.

WAV-fílur frá feltupptakarum, studio-sessionum og sendingararkivum fáa hægstu transkriberingsnøjvleikan — ongin kodekkkompressión at arbeiða við. Legg upp ein WAV og fá eitt fullt talaramerkt transkript.

Drop a file, or pick one

MP3 · WAV · M4A · MP4 · MOV · MKV · OGG · OPUS · FLAC · WEBM — up to 100 MB anonymously

Paste a link, we’ll fetch the audio

YouTube · TikTok · Vimeo · Twitter · SoundCloud · Spotify · 50+ more

Record straight from your browser

Sign up takes 30 seconds — recording opens right after, in the dashboard.

No card required~90s per 60-min fileSRT · VTT · DOCX · TXTFiles auto-deleted in 24h

↓ Watch what happens

Audio in. Transcript out.

Drop a file, paste a URL, or record live — text appears back with speaker labels and timestamps. Same pipeline whether the source is a file, a URL, or your microphone.

Microphone · liveREC 00:07.41
en-US auto-detected16 kHz mono
~90s
Transcript · streaming2 speakers · 47:08
S1

Thanks for making the time. I want to start with framing — what was the original hypothesis behind the project?

S2

Honestly, maybe forty percent. The shape held — the mechanics underneath had to be rebuilt almost entirely.

S1

What flipped it for you? Was there one customer call, one piece of data

~95% accuracy on clean audioSRT · DOCX · TXT · JSON

↓ This is the dashboard

This is what loads when the job finishes.

Same layout as the real dashboard — Summary, full Transcript, Speakers tab, Exports. Key points and action items extracted automatically. Auto-tags on every job.

Try it on your own file — it's free

Three real options · honest comparison

Built-in dictation, AI speech-to-text, or a human transcriber.

Three legitimate ways to get text from spoken audio in 2026. Each is best for different work. Honest numbers below — no claim that AI matches a professional human transcriber on hard audio.

Option 01

Built-in dictation

Live, free, on-device. Handy for short bursts while you talk.

Accuracy · clear English~85%
Speaker separationNo
TimestampsNo
Languages~30
60-min fileLive only
CostFree
Best forShort voice notes while you walk. Hands-free messaging. Dictating an email at a stoplight.
Option 02

AI speech-to-text

~30× faster than realtime. 100+ languages. Speaker labels. The sweet spot for most work.

Accuracy · clear English95%+
Speaker separationYes (Pro+)
TimestampsPer sentence
Languages100+ auto
60-min file~90 s
Cost · per min$0.03
Best forInterview recordings · meeting notes · podcast transcripts · YouTube subtitles · batch jobs · API automation · field journalism.
Option 03

Human transcriber

Gold-standard accuracy when the audio is hard or the stakes are legal.

Accuracy · clear English98–99%
Speaker separationManual
TimestampsPer turn
LanguagesPer transcriber
60-min file4–8 hours
Cost · per min$1–3
Best forLegal depositions · medical dictation · archival oral history · anything where 95%+ accuracy is non-negotiable.

Built-in dictation figures from public iOS / Android speech API benchmarks. Human transcriber rates from US/UK industry surveys 2024–2025.

Accuracy · real-world numbers

95%+ on clear English. It holds up on real-world recordings too.

Modern transcription reaches 95%+ word accuracy on clear English at 128 kbps and above, comparable to a human transcriber on the same recording. The audio coming in sets the ceiling — cleaner source, cleaner transcript. The breakdown below covers the recordings we actually see in production.

97%+
Clean studio audio

USB or studio microphone in a treated room. Single speaker at conversational distance. The headline number.

95%+
Clear English at 128 kbps+

Podcast masters, interview recordings, well-mic'd meetings. The sweet spot for most professional work.

93%
Real-world podcast

Field-recorded interviews, podcast episodes at 64–128 kbps, multi-speaker recordings. Usable for editorial without a review pass.

91%
Meeting room recording

Ceiling mic, omnidirectional capture, mild reverb, multiple speakers at distance. Plan a rename pass on the speaker chips.

Common questions

6 things people ask about this.

01Hvørjar WAV specifikatiónir eru studdar?+
Allar PCM WAV fílur: sample kollveltingar frá 8 kHz til 192 kHz, bitdýpi av 16-bit, 24-bit ella 32-bit float, mono ella stereo kanalar. Bæði standard WAV (.wav) og Broadcast Wave Format (.bwf) extensionir virka uttan umseting.
02Ger tapleysur WAV veruliga betri transkriberingsnøjvleika?+
Ja, í minni mun. WAV gevur transkriberingsrørslukettuni fulla ljóðsignal uttan perseptuellar kompressiónsartefaktir. Á flestum upptøkum er framgongdin yvir ein høgkvalitets MP3 1–3%. Á torførum upptøkum (sterk arvum, lætt bakgrundsstoy, marknalin ljóðkvalitet) hevur hesin munurin týdning.
03Feltupptakarin mín goymir 24-bit WAV við 96 kHz. Virkar tað?+
Ja. 24-bit 96 kHz WAV er viðtikið og virkar uttan nakra umseting. Rørslukettan normaliserar sample kollveltingina innanhýsis — 96 kHz seinkar ikki viðgerðina ella orsakar kompatibilitetsproblem.
04Hvat er maks WAV fílustødd?+
Frítt: 100 MB (umleið 10 minuttir av 16-bit 44.1 kHz stereo, umleið 20 minuttir mono), 30-min mark per fíl. Pro: 2 GB (umleið 45 minuttir stereo, umleið 90 minuttir mono), upp til 10 tímar per fíl í longd. Business: 5 GB (umleið 3 tímar stereo, umleið 6 tímar mono), upp til 10 tímar per fíl. WAV er bundið av stødd meira enn longd. Til fleirfílarsarkiv, send hvørja fíl sum eina særliga API uppgávu.
05Kani eg fáa eitt SRT frá einum WAV fíl?+
Ja. Útflyt SRT ella VTT frá transkript síðuni. Tíðamerkingarnar javnalinast við WAV positiónirnar — nýttugt um tú editorar video við hesum WAV sum ljóðkagga.
06Er WAV betri enn MP3 til transkribering?+
Við samsvarandi upptøkufyrimyndum, gevur WAV 1–3% hægri nøjvleika enn 128 kbps MP3 — og markant meira enn 64 kbps ella lægri. Hevur tú upprunaligu upptøkuna sum WAV, brúk hana. Hevur tú bara eitt MP3, so vil tað MP3 enn transkribera við 95%+ á klárum tali.

Drop something in. See what comes out.

30 fríar minuttir um mánaðin, onga kort. Legg upp WAV — transkript, talaramerkingar og SRT umleið 90 sekund.

Byrja frítt transkribering